The Quantum Cloud Access Project

David Nicholaeff

New Mexico Consortium

12 June 2025

tl;dr

Request a user account with QCAP:

Send an email to [email protected]

To: [email protected]
Subject: QCAP New User Request
Body: <Let us know which platforms you would like to run experiments on, and
ideally provide an estimate of the number of QPU hours you would like to use.>

For technical assistance, including coding and running problems on QCAP platforms:

Contact Dnic (me) at [email protected]

Intuition and Computation

  • In dimensions, the radius of the bound red sphere .

Vendor Platforms

  • D-Wave Advantage2
  • QuEra Aquila
  • Quantinuum H1 (and H2)
  • Va bishtar...

D-Wave: Architecture

  • Quantum annealer
    • Is not adiabatic, i.e. does not start in the ground state of and
      stay there through the slow evolution to
    • Start in an arbitrary initial state, start with large transverse field that
      does not commute with
  • Composed of SQUIDs (Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices)
    • Flux qubits interrupted by Josephson junctions (micrometer scale)
      with clockwise and counterclockwise computational basis states
    • Couplers are also SQUIDs, namely compound Josephson junctions
      • Biasing the couplers allows ferromagnetic, antiferromagnetic, or zero interaction

D-Wave: Hamiltonian

(I.e., the Ising model)

D-Wave: Access/Example

  1. Pyenv -> venv -> dwave setup
    • (dwave auth login was useless for this example)
  2. Start the app
  3. Lots of samples quickly

QuEra: Architecture

  • Neutral atoms (Rubidium-87)
    • Long coherence times
  • Optical tweezers trap and arrange individual atoms into customizable 2D geometries
  • Atoms are excited to high-energy Rydberg states, followed by the Rydberg blockade
  • Adiabatic theorem holds
  • Unsorted
  • Sorting protocol
  • Sorted

QuEra Hamiltonian

  • is the Rabi frequency, is the driving laser phase, are the lowering/raising operators /, is the detuning between the laser frequency and atomic transition frequency, is the number operator (flipped for QuEra, 1 for the "shining" ground state, 0 for the "dark" Rydberg state), and is a vdW coefficient
  • The driving term is the first summation, i.e. coherent drive of each qubit between ground and Rydberg states
  • The second term accounts for energy shifts due to detuning
  • The final sum models the van der Waals interactions between pairs of Rydberg atoms
  • Coding is realized by tuning , , and , and providing a list of atom positions

QuEra: Access/Example

  1. test_submission.py
  2. Vercel portal
  • Reminder: Is this password hashed? Filter on 119 no *
  1. test_submission.html

Quantinuum: Architecture

  • Trapped-ions
    • H1 has yterrbium-171 ions
    • Newer platforms have moved to barium-137
  • Laser-driven gates by way of Raman transitions
  • Mølmer–Sørensen interaction enables entangling gates via collective phonon modes
  • Arbitrary quantum circuits, i.e. not analog

Quantinuum: Hamiltonian

  • : Pauli operators for qubit (j)
  • : Transition frequency of qubit (j)
  • : Frequency of vibrational mode (m)
  • : Phonon annihilation/creation operators
  • : Lamb-Dicke parameter (coupling strength of ion (j) to mode (m))
  • : Rabi frequency (laser drive strength)
  • : Laser frequency

Quantinuum: Access/Example

  • Nexus
  • Lab time
  • Single organization <= Google federation

Adiabatic Circuit Model

Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., Gutmann, S., Lapan, J., Lundgren, A., & Preda, D. (2001). A Quantum Adiabatic Evolution Algorithm Applied to Random Instances of an NP-Complete Problem. Science, 292(5516), 472–475. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1057726

Adiabatic Circuit Model

Aharonov, D., van Dam, W., Kempe, J., Landau, Z., Lloyd, S., & Regev, O. (2008). Adiabatic Quantum Computation Is Equivalent to Standard Quantum Computation. SIAM Review, 50(4), 755–787. https://doi.org/10.1137/080734479

Intuition...

geometry of the history state

clock_hamiltonian

References

References (cont.)

  • Herbert, S. (2019). Course: Quantum Computing. Dept. of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge. https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/teaching/1920/QuantComp/

    • Lecture 15, adiabatic annealing
  • Scherer, W. (2019). Mathematics of Quantum Computing. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12358-1

    • Chapter 8.5 and Appendix G, Replicating a Circuit Based by an Adiabatic Computation and Proof of a Quantum Adiabatic Theorem
  • Aharonov, D., van Dam, W., Kempe, J., Landau, Z., Lloyd, S., & Regev, O. (2007). Adiabatic Quantum Computation is Equivalent to Standard Quantum Computation. SIAM Journal on Computing, 37(1), 166–194. https://doi.org/10.1137/s0097539705447323

References (cont.)

  • Recent LANL Publications of Interest
    • Kirmani, A., Pelofske, E., Bärtschi, A., Eidenbenz, S., & Zhu, J.-X. (2025). Variational Quantum Simulations of a Two-Dimensional Frustrated Transverse-Field Ising Model on a Trapped-Ion Quantum Computer (Version 1). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2505.22932
    • Lopez-Bezanilla, A., Bernoudy, W., Boothby, K., Raymond, J., Nocera, A., & King, A. D. (2025). Quantum dynamics in frustrated Ising fullerenes (Version 1). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2505.08994
    • Sathe, P., King, A. D., Mniszewski, S. M., Coffrin, C., Nisoli, C., & Caravelli, F. (2025). Classical Criticality via Quantum Annealing (Version 1). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2505.13625

Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) established the Quantum Cloud Access Project (QCAP) with the New Mexico Consortium (NMC) in order to provide a direct conduit for LANL researchers to experiment on commercial quantum systems. The first couple of years of the project have primarily focused on analog quantum systems, including D-Wave's Advantage2 platform, and QuEra's Aquila quantum computer. We are now vigorously moving into fault-tolerant, error-corrected, digital systems. Concurrently, the NMC's mission is built on education and community outreach across New Mexico. In this talk, we will cover three platforms available to you, the QCSS students: D-Wave's Advantage2, QuEra's Aquila, and Quantinuum's System Model H1. For each platform, we will cover the underlying architecture, how to gain access, and some toy model problems. (Other vendors are available but will not be covered.) Time permitting, we will then go through a sketch proof of the Kitaev-Feynman clock construction establishing polynomial equivalence between the adiabatic model and the standard circuit model of quantum computation.

- $A(s)$ represents the transverse, or tunneling, energy - $B(s)$ is the energy applied to the problem Hamiltonian - $s$ is the ratio between the current time during the anneal and the total annealing time and has a value between 0 and 1

- An excited atom prevents neighboring atoms from being excited, facilitating entanglement and gate operations - The blockade also allows simulating ordered phases of matter by positioning atoms in different lattice structures

Physical Interpretation: - Single-Qubit Terms: Internal energy of qubits - Phonon Modes: Quantized motion of the ion chain - Spin-Phonon Coupling: Drives entanglement via shared motional modes

- In the Feynman-Kitaev construction, each step of the circuit is enforced by a three-local Hamiltonian term $H_\ell'$ that checks if the system transitions correctly from time step $t=\ell-1$ to $t=\ell$ under the intended unitary gate $U_\ell$ - Action on: - The clock register to ensure the transition is between $|\ell - 1\rangle |\ell - 1\rangle$ and $|\ell\rangle |\ell\rangle$ - The computation register to apply $U_\ell$ - The coherence between timesteps, i.e. to penalize inconsistent evolution - These local consistency-checks ensure the proper sequence of transitions (i.e., the valid history) yields the lowest energy with probability proportional to $1/L$

Kitaev-Feynman history state: - Each blue circle represents the system's state at a discrete clock time, i.e., $|\psi_t\rangle |\psi_t\rangle$ - The grey arrows denote valid transitions: unitary steps of the original quantum circuit - The dashed arc evokes the idea of coherent superposition across time—hinting that the actual history state is not a traversal, but a weighted sum over all these snapshots

Geometric and energetic structure: - The orange path is the valid 1D history subspace—each point is a legal computational step $|\psi_t\rangle |\psi_t\rangle$ - The gold band represents the low-energy subspace preserved by the clock Hamiltonian - The grey bands above and below are high-energy regions: any deviation from the valid history (marked with red Xs) is penalized - The spectral gap between the ground state manifold and excited states is indicated explicitly, emphasizing that small deviations incur a non-negligible energy cost - This gap is crucial—it ensures that the history state remains the unique ground state and that small perturbations don’t destabilize the encoded computation